Belief in Recovery…

By Darcy B.
Alcoholics Anonymous and its 12-Step approach place significant emphasis on belief in a power greater than oneself locating the source of recovery outside the individual. I take a different view.
I believe the power to recover resides within us. During active addiction, that capacity is often buried, obscured, or inaccessible, and recovery begins when it is consciously located, reclaimed, and nurtured. The key to this is belief. I believe that what we believe is far less important than how we believe. The object of belief matters only insofar as it is something we can genuinely commit to. It is the way belief is held, its depth and conviction, that drives the changes necessary for long term sobriety and recovery. Without conviction, belief has little practical effect.
From this perspective, whether one believes recovery depends on a higher power or on strength within oneself is less important than whether that belief leads to meaningful action. It is my belief that meaningful action in the context of recovery, is change. It is the sustained effort to think, behave, and respond differently.
For me, change begins with vision. A clear vision provides a reference point to work toward. It establishes the context, or destination, of what a successful change journey might look like. My vision begins with the words, “In my final days, I can look back at my life and know the following…” With an endpoint defined, we can begin to build a roadmap. We can identify obstacles we are likely to face, examine weaknesses that need strengthening, and recognize strengths that can be further leveraged. From there, we decide what comes next. I believe in taking a first step toward change, then stopping to assess whether that step has moved us closer to the endpoint, sideways, or backward. If necessary, we adjust, take the next step, and repeat the process.
So how do I assess progress? I use the concept of integrity in a very practical way. I am living with integrity when what I believe, think, say, and do are aligned in everything I do. When I feel ill at ease with something, it is usually because that alignment has been lost. My actions or words may no longer reflect my thinking, or my thinking may no longer be aligned with my beliefs. Regardless of the source, the discomfort is a signal that something needs to be addressed. That becomes my next step. Then I reassess and repeat the process.
The 12 Steps of Alcoholics Anonymous offer another mechanism for change. The first three steps focus on acceptance and willingness, while steps four through twelve address the work of change itself. Their value lies in the structure and accountability they provide, not in where the source of power is located. When engaged with conviction, the steps can support meaningful change whether one frames that belief in terms of a higher power or personal responsibility.
No single framework works for everyone. Different people require different structures, languages, and points of entry to engage in meaningful change. What matters is not the specific model being used, but whether it provides enough clarity, discipline, and accountability to support sustained change. For some, the structure of the 12 Steps provides that foundation. For others, a different approach may be more honest and effective. The value of any framework lies not in what it asks us to believe, but in whether it helps us change how we live.
For me, integrity with oneself matters more than adherence to any particular model. Change breaks down quickly when it is built on language or beliefs that are not aligned with what we think or feel. When we say things we do not believe, or commit to ideas we quietly reject, that alignment is lost from the start. Over time, that loss of integrity shows up in our actions. Recovery requires a level of integrity that allows us to acknowledge what is true for us, even when that truth is uncomfortable. Without that integrity, no framework, regardless of how well designed, can sustain meaningful change.
Recovery is not a question of which belief system is correct, but of whether belief is held with enough conviction to drive change. The power to recover does not come from the object of belief, but from the willingness to act on it honestly and consistently. Change requires vision, effort, and continual assessment, guided by integrity and grounded in what is true for us. When belief leads to meaningful action, and when action is aligned with what we believe, think, say, and do, recovery becomes possible. Different paths may lead there, but the work remains the same.
Darcy attended his first AA meeting in 1989 and entered treatment in 1990. It would take another 21 years before he reached his final breaking point and it was in the summer of 2011 that he admitted he was an alcoholic and made sobriety his top priority.
Over time, he embraced his agnostic beliefs and developed a personal approach to recovery rooted in the idea that the strength to stay sober comes from within, while remaining connected to the AA and recovery community for support when needed.
Darcy is the father of three and a proud grandfather of four. He has a lifelong passion for music and spends much of his free time designing and building guitars.
For A PDF of this article, click here: Belief in Recovery.
We need more articles on AA Agnostica! Would you like to write one? Please do! For a few more details click here.























I too believe change comes from within and not waiting for something outside to provide guidance. “waiting for Godot” comes to mind. as does a line from Genesis carpet crawlers….”ya gotta get in to get out”. Lastly the chorus of a Cheap Trick song….”surrender, surrender but don’t give yourself away”. Don’t give up your self, that inner voice, that better self and hope something outside yourself shows you the way.
Thanks for the essay, Darcy.
“No single framework works for everyone. Different people require different structures, languages, and points of entry to engage in meaningful change. What matters is not the specific model being used, but whether it provides enough clarity, discipline, and accountability to support sustained change. For some, the structure of the 12 Steps provides that foundation. For others, a different approach may be more honest and effective.”
It’s a lazy habit, maybe, that we call ourselves a 12-step organization. We don’t know how many people have started the Steps, how many of us did all of them in any formal way, or if that’s the “secret ingredient” that got, or more accurately, keeps us sober. We don’t know, because we don’t ask. There is a lot that I just assume about recovery cause and effect. I think there are more like me.
I don’t doubt the value of self-reflection, meditation, helping others, focusing on my truth/worldview, and being a more thoughtful person. These are not 12-step inventions. We learned more from Writing the Big Book by Wm. Schaberg. The Steps were a Bill W idea, not something that evolved from the collective. The stories in the first Big Book are success stories from people who never heard of the Steps since they hadn’t been created yet.
It’s revisionist history to claim these steps were what early AA was about. Look, I worked the Steps, as and when needed, not in any order, some formally and some more piecemeal. I benefited from the efforts. But I am not sure this is why I am sober today.
Oh, I have ideas, and my assumptions change with time. In the end, there is always mystery. Sure, I would prefer irrefutable truth, but I settle for the wonder of mystery. And these are essential things to think about and write about. Thanks again for another helpful AAagnostica article.
I joined up in 1966 and I’ve not had a drink since but my main focus was helping someone else stay sober not about me staying sober I still believe that today I know we’re losing that in AA but I believe it’s still to be true
If you dig into the history of the 12 steps one of the early contributors suggested replacing the word “God” with the term “good”. After some consideration Bill rejected the idea but it would be interesting to imagine what would have happened.
I’ve spent many years trying to understand why AA ,as an atheist , works for me. The secular movemment has allowed me to further understand and be able to verbalize my thoughts.
Integrity is a key element to staying sober, for me. I have looked at the concept of of spirituality and morality for years. Secular AA helped me to define spiritual and moral as ethical [ behavior ]The two concepts are separated in academic and religious definitions. I dug deeper and found having ethics is arguably synonymous with many definitions of spirituality and morality. And in this essay , i.e. INTEGRITY!
My Google search says…..;
Integrity means being honest, having strong moral principles, and acting with consistency and wholeness in character, often summarized as “doing the right thing even when no one is looking”. It involves internal consistency, a commitment to ethical values, and being complete or undivided, both in moral character (honesty, fairness) and in a physical sense (being unimpaired). Essentially, integrity is your moral compass, guiding you to align actions with principles, building trust and a reputation for reliability.
Thank you Darcy B.
Hi Darcy,
For me, your essay has a very existentialist feel to it. When I first started attending in 2007, I noticed that AA had an existential underpinning to it, even though the formalities of the meetings reminded me of the type of supernatural religion I was exposed to as a boy.
If anyone currently checks the internet, they will find that there has been a resurgence of interest in existentialism in the last 10-15 years, since the days of its widespread popularity in the 50s and 60s. (Still, as recently as 1999, AA historian and friend of secular AA, Ernie Kurtz, wrote about the existential parallels of AA in a comprehensive essay titled “Why A.A. Works: The Intellectual Significance of Alcoholics Anonymous.”)
One key aspect of existentialism, which you capture so well with your emphasis on “integrity,” Darcy, is existentialism’s insistence on “authenticity.” Obviously, secular members of AA have a significant issue with AA’s prioritization of “God” as the sole means to sobriety and recovery. It is simply inauthentic and in “bad faith” to continue with a traditional AA belief system when we don’t believe these religious tenets lead us to sobriety and recovery.
And, Darcy, you effectively illustrate the existential and humanist ideals of inward reflection (versus accepting unexamined objective AA authority) as a means of determining and committing to values that must have a legitimate grounding in human connectedness.
So, thank you for giving us a flavour of the concepts used by existentialists: integrity/authenticity, conviction, inwardness, groundedness, meaningful action, responsibility, to name but a few.
I’ve never linked my thoughts on this back to existentialism but I see now they align very closely. Thank you for this insight.