The Real Objection to the Plain Language Bigga Booka

By Bobby Beach
A small number of Facebook warriors continue their battle against the Plain Language Big Book. In many ways, they are (very much) like the folks bemoaning the old news that the Lord’s Prayer was jettisoned from America’s public schools decades ago. C’est un fait accompli, mes amis. On second thought, were the current administration to somehow reverse that decision, I would not be shocked.
This is not to say that the translation project was perfectly executed. It wasn’t. Some dumb mistakes were made. Bobby Beach could have done a better job. Nevertheless, procedures were followed and approval via the group conscience was obtained. The claim that the PLBB was “smuggled in under the cover of Covid” is ridiculous mythology. Proposals for a simplified book date back to 2016.
Before the release of the Plain Language Big Book on November 1st of 2024, there was freaken paranoia in some camps that the AA program was going to be secularized. We were warned that there were hidden agendas beyond the stated purposes of the publication which were:
-
To simplify the language and thus render the text comprehensible to people with Grade 5 reading skills;
-
To make the content more relatable to 21st Century readers.
Why would anyone object to these goals? Wouldn’t members want alcoholics with relatively poor reading skills to have access to a version of AA’s principal text that they could read and comprehend? Wouldn’t it be a good idea to replace dated idiom such as “boiled as an owl?”
Of course, there is an extremely vocal camp of AA members who will battle to the death to prevent any change WHAT-EV-AH to the content of the Bigga Booka!! If Bill Freaken Wilson wrote “boiled as an owl,” then owls must continue to be boiled, even if alcoholics of the millennial brand have no clue as to what in Holy Hell that means.
“I have two degrees from a top-notch university, Bobby Beach, and I didn’t know what Dr. Bob was talking about when he wrote ‘I was caught between Scylla and Charybdis.’”
Quite so, Grasshopper. The fundies are very upset that the PLBB changes that to “I was stuck between a rock and a hard place now.” In executing a project with the core mission of changing words, words were changed. Oh, my!!
“Don’t Big Book Thumpers want readers to understand Alcoholics Anonymous, Bobby?”
Not without the guidance of a sponsor. A special sponsor. A Bigga Booka Thumpa sponsa.
TO WIVES
Let’s be real about what we’re dealing with here, my starry-eyed friend. The First, Second, Third, and Fourth Editions of the Bigga Booka have a chapter titled “TO WIVES.” The upcoming Fifth Edition will have a chapter called “TO WIVES.” That will take us to about 2050 continuing to perpetuate the notion that alcoholics are men and their spouses are women. In 2025, there are about seven or eight hundred thousand women alcoholics who are members of AA. For those who are married to men, we have a chapter that might be of help to their husbands. It’s called “TO WIVES.” Here you go, Tom. Read this and remember to do no nagging!
“But that’s just dumb, Bobby!! The ‘TO WIVES’ chapter has multiple problems but can’t they at least change the stupid title?”
It is amended to “TO PARTNERS” in the Plain Language Bigga Booka and the conservatives are outraged. The mega-dumbness of calling husbands “wives” was divinely freaken inspired, apparently, and cannot be modified. We cannot change a single word of the sacred text, even though in the early years, many words were changed.
In 1938, the working title of the book was One Hundred Men. That was switched because of the presence of a sober Florence Rankin whose “FEMININE VICTORY” unfortunately altered neither the chapter title nor the content of “TO WIVES.” The overall “boy’s club” atmosphere of the young society remained intact.
For the conspiracy theorists, there’s a special deviousness involving the term “partners” owing to the use of that word in the LGBTQ+ community. The General Service Office folks are seen by the anti-PLBB protesters as promoting a “woke” agenda, God forbid.
But back to the supposed secularization—that simply didn’t happen. Not even a little bit.
The PLBB is as Godly as ever. As one of a hundred possible examples of that, here are the rewritten ABC’s:
-
That we were alcoholic and could not manage our own lives.
-
That no human power could have stopped or changed our alcoholism.
-
That God could and would help us if we tried to find God.
The original publication offers a Godly solution to alcoholism—a spiritchewal awakening—and so does the Plain Language Big Book. It’s presented in both cases as the only solution to the drink problem. That reality is undeniable and crystal clear.
History 101
Thanks to the urging of people like Jimmy Burwell and Hank Parkhurst and to Bill Wilson’s understanding of the alcoholic’s general wariness of, and even aversion to religion, the Christianity of AA’s solution was toned down in the crafting of the Big Book’s content. The name “Christ” appears only once in the vaunted first 164 pages. It’s an historical reference to Bill W.’s religious exposure as a youngster and his conclusion: “To Christ I conceded the certainty of a great man, not too closely followed by those who claimed Him. His moral teaching most excellent.” The name “Jesus” appears not at all.
Considering AA’s roots in the Oxford Group’s Christian fellowship, Bible reading in meetings, kneeling surrenders, etc., the text departed significantly from the overtly Christian practices of the early members (possibly because such an approach would have adversely affected sales of the book). There can be no denying the profiteering aspects of the publication venture—Ohio AA members were the first to object to what they called “the New York project” and its attempt to commercialize spirituality. Pass It On, a conference-approved volume describing early AA history, has Hank Parkhurst’s son reporting that his father and Bill Wilson expected to make a million dollars from book sales. A book costing thirty-four cents to print was retailed for three dollars and fifty cents. Holy Freaken Gouging, Batman!!
Akron AA was extremely churchy and had those people taken the helm, we’d have seen a fully Christian organization. Perhaps, by now, Alcoholics Anonymous would be a mere footnote in the history of the recovery movement. Things could have been freaken worse.
Parkhurst pressed for far more toning down of the spiritual aspects but he was overruled by Bill Wilson. To be clear, there was no secularization—simply a theism less attached to Christian Protestantism. There was no option of turning to uncapitalized “higher powers.” As Bob Smith famously remarked to a waffling Clarence Snyder: “God is God, Young Man!” The option of choosing one’s own conception of God was offered but the liberality of all that was somewhat muddled by the 1930s language describing a “He-Him” God and the not-so-subtle implications that the prospect would eventually “come around.”
God As you Understand God
The world of spirituality in the America of 2025 is a far broader realm. Far broader. People are connecting with Buddhism, Stoicism, Taoism, etc. to an extent unimagined in 1939. In most areas of North America, church attendance has plummeted. A less Christian presentation of AA’s message would be more relatable to a great many 21st Century prospects.
Understandably, although Bill Wilson wisely broadened the God options for potential members, there is an undeniable Christian tone to the Big Book’s “spiritual” language and the descriptions of the Supreme Being. There are a lot of “He-Him’s.”
“Bobby, I’ve always thought that ‘God as we understood Him’ would be better as ‘God as we understood God.’ Among other things, that’s less offensive to women. That’s another area where society has changed greatly from 1939 until now.”
Grasshopper, it amazes me that God-smacked fundamentalists would object to more instances of the God word in the Bigga Booka but, obviously, the Christers are pressed by their mission to evangelize. The PLBB deviates somewhat from the message that there is ONE TRUE GOD.
It’s worth remembering that these are the same folks who freaked out when some retailers took up the term “Happy Holidays,” thus starting the War on Christmas. Folks love seeing themselves as victims!
“But Bobby Beach, isn’t Alcoholics Anonymous ‘spiritual and not religious?’”
That’s what we’d like you to believe.
Bobby Beach has contributed a variety of articles to AA Agnostica.
I guess progress not perfection has broad applicability.
What fun. I heard the original Beach in Billings, MT on a fairly intimate basis in about 2000 when he was 84 and also read “his?” white paper at a later date. Even though I knew I was an atheist, I looked forward to his scheduled reappearance at the Paha Sapa Conference in the Black Hills about a year later. I wanted to bring some of my religious friends (particularly women) to hear his very spiritual “so I felt like I was walking hand in hand with Jesus and looking up to him and saying “What now, God?”. He had a kind of magic in his presentation as evidenced by the 7 or so wives he’d acquired. That show was cancelled due to bad knees which I now can begin to appreciate myself.
It’s hard to imagine the pervasiveness of ritualistic talk and imagination prevalent in the American culture until one gets outside of it. And Bobby Beach does a great job of blowing holes in that mindset. As always, thank you, bob k.
Speaking of a simpler language big book, our group has used Beyond Belief by Joe C. for several years along with a stoic reader and we have also tried to gain ritual through a few of the secular AA books published and pointed out on the aaagnostica website. Beyond Belief is wonderful for people with English language and developed thinking skills, but I find it hard to include people with earlier skillsets.
There is a new reader from bob k called “Daily Reflections for a Modern Twelve Step Recovery” (simpler, right?) which is just a tad simpler to read and understand. One might wish to stock up as christmas is just around the corner.
Heh heh, Bobby. I have heard it said regarding a reason the book should not be changed, why would one then need a sponsor? My retort to such a comment would be, the book was designed to be used as a sobriety handbook in places where there were no meetings. Another questioner at an AA Zoom presentation asked, if a sponsee has the plbb and I don’t, how can we work together? The AA organizer answered, they could find another sponsor.
I’m following this endless debate since 32 years now…
I’m an atheist, I don’t have to have any « understanding » of a god. And I’m not Buddhist, Taoist, Zoroastrian, or whatsoever either…
Spirituality is always a byproduct of a religion.
It’s not a solution it’s an obstacle to live in reality.
Thanks, Bobby. It’s awfully kind of you to use your valuable time to keep the readership of AA Agnostica informed about an issue that holds little relevance to our readership. It’s like being caught between Scylla and Charybdis. Or is it like being stuck between a rock and a hard place?
Hard for me to pass up an opportunity to poke some fun at the “We’re spiritchewal (yum yum) not religious (yucky yucky)” classic AA claim. The two things are not so different. Think about that as we close our meeting with the totally generic “Lord’s Prayer.”
What progressiveness and positive change are available for atheism when it rests on insults and sarcasm? Atheists (like me), or non-believing agnostics, never found humour or entertainment when sarcasm and patronizing insults were directed at us. It was not fun then and it cannot be fun now. These types of posts are sarcasm and harbour insults and finely concealed resentments and insecurities. For 55 years I have seen many righteous/atheist types gleefully leap into these “justified resentments” against religion and traditional AA. When atheism or non-belief is righteous and caustic it is based on resentment—this is harmful. Calling any of it “funny” is abusive. There is no “spirituality” or compassion or acceptance and no harmony or progress into recovery. Many people walk into the future staring back at everything they disagree with. It’s a justified cruel righteousness and no one benefits. Leave others to their beliefs and spend more time minding your own recovery. There’s emotional profit for you and freedom (from your righteousness) for everyone else.
Prior to the release of the Plain Language Bigga Booka, there was a lot of wringing of hands and gloom and doom forecasts of the secularization of AA. Of course, that didn’t happen and yet, the gripers continue to complain that the message has been changed. It turns out that in spite of AA’s invitation to choose one’s own conception of God the Christian camp continues to hope that converts will eventually come to embrace the one TRUE God, the He/Him of the 1939 book.
In this sense, the PLBB’s effort to be more relatable is displeasing to the Christians. Yes, the Beach-meister enjoys poking a bit of fun at the agents of “no change.” Guilty as charged.
For my Area’s Pre-Conference session this year, I compiled
1. a set of quotes from Bill W. regarding literature being “frozen as solid as an ice cube,”
2. some facts about and examples of changes Bill made to quotes from /Alcoholics Anonymous/ when he wrote /The A.A. Way of Life/ (later retitled to /As Bill Sees It/),
3. a well-known quote from Bob P. about the dangers of rigidity in A.A., and
4. a couple of my own closing thoughts.
Anyone interested can request a copy by emailing me at a59p61@gmail.com.
Thank you for clearing things up and making it make sense about the new book.
Thanks, Bobby. I too get quite frustrated by the fundamentalists and the condescending, thinly-veiled protestantism of Bill and Bob and the original Big Book. However, I have two objections:
1) What is with the weird accent you attribute to fundamentalists? (“Bigga Booka Thumpa sponsa”)? This sounds vaguely like some Godfather-inspired anti-Italian bigotry, man. What gives?
2) As much as Dr. Bob often annoys me, I do have to side with him on Scylla and Charybdis. The Odyssey is a central text of Western literature, and I fail to see how anyone could have two degrees from a top-notch university (heck, even a B.A. from a state college or a diploma from a decent high school) without recognizing that allusion.
Other than those two points, nice job.
Yes, and in this era of internet access, it’s even more unforgivable to not attempt to discover the meaning of words when online dictionaries provide us with immediate access.
Thanks Bobby Beach. I do not know about others but my experience of AA and secular AA have changed and altered continuously since the time I was sent to rehab. One of the first things I noticed is that two of the cornerstones of AA as we know it – sponsorship and meetings – are not covered in the original literature. The second thing was the number of messiah’s, gurus, priests and shamans who considered themselves to be “experts” on the Bigliest Strong Book. Then the number of people who consider the late 1930’s view by amateur Bill Wilson to be the definitive word on alcoholism – in spite of the fact that he clearly stated he did not consider it that way at all. Dr. Silkworth suggested alcoholism was an allergy at a time when nobody really knew what al allergy was – which ironically was why they called it that.
Anyway.
Quitting drinking is one thing and learning to live in contented sobriety is quite another. “The Steps” are the method that was chosen long ago to deliver the principles of sobriety. That alone is problematic since sobriety is a process of change and improvement not a goal. The term “spirituality” has had all meaning ground out of it to the extent that I would replace it with “emotional health”. Alcoholism and addiction are much better understood today and most professionals seem to be at least competent in providing treatment. AUD is recognised as a psycho-emotional behavioral disorder – which is very specific and not some kind of arcane psycho-babble. The “God” aspect of treatment is optional since it only works for those who believe there is such a thing. It is no longer “get God or die”.
Some culty people really want to keep us in the magic days of the 1930’s but it is inevitable that AA will – however slowly – change as these folks die off. The amount fear and alcoholic thinking that permeates the fellowship will also diminish over time I hope.
I doubt the PLBB will radically change AA since the fellowship is after all an anarchy of addicts in various states of recovery. If it brings a few more people into the club it is good.
It dismays me that we can’t or won’t change. Surely contemporaneous in terms of societal norms and expectations should be our aim but seems not somehow. And there is this notion that somehow we are being true to our founding spirit or principle, but I take a different view on that. To me Bill and Bob were pioneers of their times. They operated within the norms of their times and within this context were progressive. But I believe that, if they time-travelled to this debate, they would’ve been incredulous that we hadn’t changed and progressed over the years. Imagine Bill/Bob starting out today as Gen Z’s?. Personally, although there is loads that I love about AA, I cannot read texts such as ‘how it works’ talking about ‘unfortunates’ ‘constitutional incapability’ ‘that one is god, may you find him now’. Those are not consistent with my values, or the values of my family or friends more generally. In terms of ethnicity/gender and the god issue there needs to be radical change.
I like “constitutionally incapable.” It’s an inadvertent admission that the whole process is psychological—-that there are psychological prerequisites to getting sober via the 12-step process. If God was magically poofing away the alcohol
problem, God could do that to anyone and everyone.
Dr. Esther Richards of Johns Hopkins told Wilson to not waste his time on certain populations of the mentally ill. A psychopath or narcissist would not have the necessary honesty required. In the same vein, the atheistic therapist Richard Peabody would not waste his time working with clients he deemed to be “psychotic.”
A person with an IQ of 85 is constitutionally incapable of completing a PhD program.
Well written rebuttal Roger!
Even Bill W., equated spirituality with religion. You’ll find evidence of this throughout the Big Book. I recommend a re-reading of “Bill’s Story” (his friend got religion), “The Spiritual Experience,” and Step 12 in the 12 & 12.