Fellowship not Faith

By Mick S.

In September of 2024 I had an article printed here entitled AA Then and Now which told the story of my Australian experiences in AA starting with my introduction to AA in 1966 and my subsequent 10 years of sobriety. I told of my return to drinking for many years culminating in my return to AA in 1999 and my continuous sobriety to then.

At the time of writing that piece I had distanced myself from the religiosity and cultishness of modern traditional AA. I had first hand experience of the uber traditional leadership of Australian AA and their subtle but determined resistance to secularism or any form of inclusivity within the fellowship.  I was in fact extremely disillusioned with the whole thing and formed the opinion that AA was approaching a state of total irrelevance which would see its demise over the next decade or so.

I was pretty vocal in my assertions that Secular AA needed to step up to fill the developing  vacuum. As is usually the case with volunteer organisations 90% of the work gets done by 10% of the people so even those who agreed with me were unwilling to become proactive.

It was suggested to me, possibly with some validity, that my predictions of the demise of AA was counter productive in the context of newcomers being spooked by hearing this old bloke proclaiming that their path to sobriety may disappear. There was no way I was going to be responsible for that.

So I realised that I was achieving nothing by my continued involvement with either branch of AA and in fact the stresses involved were reflecting negatively on my physical and mental health.

So, what next?

I know that my continued sobriety is contingent upon my unwavering acceptance of the fact that I am an alcoholic and can never take the first drink. That acceptance is in turn contingent upon my regular association with and identification with like-minded people.

So I decided to try creating a little group of non believers who would meet regularly on line to engage in discussion on sobriety related topics. It’s not an AA meeting but it’s certainly not anti AA. Respectful debate is encouraged and there are no rules other than those of decency and civility.

So on Feb 23rd 2025 our little Zoom group “Abstinent Atheists Australia” had it’s first meeting.

It is described in the opening of each meeting as;

“This meeting is for atheists, agnostics and freethinkers and anybody who wishes to engage with like minded people about their search for recovery from alcoholism. It is unaffiliated with any 12-step program or other organization, but it acknowledges the experiences, both negative and positive, emanating from the efforts of alcoholics throughout history to find sobriety through fellowship and mutual support. It is not an AA meeting, nor is it anti AA.”

The experience has been heartening, informative and sometimes surprising. Numbers remain small with usually a fairly even split between Australian and North American participants. There are a few, including myself who are “dyed in the wool” atheists but most would describe themselves as agnostics or tell you to mind your own business if you asked. What most participants say they value is the freedom of expression and encouragement to engage in open discussion and even (respectful) disagreement. There are no restrictions other than decency and good taste. Topics arise from the body of the meeting or from the host and informality is the keynote.

The meeting is listed on the “Worldwide Secular Meetings” website where you will find your local time. For Australians it’s 10:00 am Sundays AEST and North America early evening Saturday. ID 83192206790 PW 311200

A perusal of the “Worldwide Secular Meetings” website reveals a growing number of unaffiliated meetings catering for those who embrace the need for fellowship in their search for sobriety but are repelled by the direction AA has taken in recent times. Could this be a harbinger of times to come with people seeking sobriety being drawn to individual unaffiliated gatherings, mainly on line, because that is becoming more the norm than face to face events ? I know there are meetings I which I occasionally visit in the USA which have transitioned from secular AA to unaffiliated.

I believe that the very act of exploring various avenues of sobriety is in itself a further aid to maintaining my sobriety by keeping important priorities front of mind.

I will be forever grateful to the AA of the 60’s and 70’s which gave me a wonderful gift which I subsequently squandered, wasting 22 years of my life. I am forever grateful that the memory of those years was powerful enough to drag me out of the pit which was 1999 for me.

I feel a great sadness that it no longer exists and in its place there stands a broken and corrupted version of itself which would exclude those who are unable or unwilling to embrace a fairy tale world of fanciful deities, the existence of which there is not only no proof but not a scrap of evidence.

Even my 10yo granddaughter recently informed her parents she was a wake up to Santa, The Easter Bunny and The Tooth Fairy and she’s an atheist like grandpa. If a 10 year old can differentiate between fanciful illusions and reality why is it so hard for many adults?


Following is the bio which accompanied Mick’s 2024 contribution. This article is the continuation of his journey in sobriety having made the decision that continued interaction with today’s AA is not conducive to his good mental health or peace of mind. Mick was born in rural Victoria, Australia in 1947. At an early age he resolved never to work where he couldn’t see the sun for most of the day and a life spent largely behind the wheel of a long haul truck was the outcome. He did manage to spend some time at home as is evidenced by his 6 children, 11 grandchildren and 4 great grandchildren. Today he is retired in subtropical Brisbane Queensland with his wife, Joan, and two Cocker Spaniels, Joe and Charlie, and most of his family live within an hour’s drive. His experience of 2 introductions to AA 40 odd years apart qualifies him to draw comparisons between AA “then” and “now” and he’s no fan of the modern iteration.


For a PDF of this article, click here: Fellowship not Faith.


6 Responses

  1. Dalmasso Olivier says:

    Religious education is an infection. Once infected the mind is corrupted for ever.
    Thanks to my parents I didn’t get such an education. I was educated by atheist with a focus on science, arts, and politics.

    I’m 32 years clean. Without god or any fairy tales.

    I’m surrounded by believers…

  2. Fred VW says:

    Nice article. I too have seen newcomers turned away by the religiosity and demands of traditional AA. Bill W warned against this but apparently to little avail. I too was “saved” by discovering AA Agnostica and a secular online meeting that only encourages free thinking but a deep desire to remain sober. Maybe the day will come when a sign is posted at the entry to AA meetings: Warning: this is a god fearing AA meeting, secular meetings can be found online. However I doubt it.

  3. David W says:

    Thank you for the article Mick. Meetings breaking away from secular and traditional AA may be the next evolution of addiction peer support. I do get weary of the non-ending conversation around faith/non-faith in meetings. I wish we could just let the issue go and concentrate on telling our individual stories and sharing our knowledge of what works for each of us. Unfortunately the theistic rigidity and intolerance that is AA’s legacy seems to be fueling an ongoing conversation in secular meetings of why traditional AA doesn’t work for them, why the concept of a higher power doesn’t resonate, why the traditional steps fail them, on and on and on.

    I did a significant amount of non-addiction group therapy before becoming ensnared in alcoholism. People in group therapy come in and talk about their personal issues, life struggles, relationship challenges, trauma and mental health issues. They don’t discuss or debate the theoretical underpinnings of the therapeutic modality of the group, or do readings on said modality followed by a discussion.

    I’ve come to realize that the doctrine of AA unity has been weaponized by those who wish the fellowship to remain frozen in both time and philosophy and used as an excuse to impose mandated theistic belief. Anything other than a cookie cutter Big Book approach doesn’t seem to be acceptable to a lot of the membership.

  4. Marty says:

    Really appreciate all you’re doing. Saved the meeting info and will try to attend. I still attend 3 to 5 in person AA meetings, they are a point of service (if you want to help other alcoholics AA is good place to find them, lol) and I’m still occasionally inspired- was at a meeting last Tuesday night and they closed with the responsibility statement and that was awesome. I also had the opportunity to share AA agnostica and the Secular AA website with some newcomers that I noticed were really uncomfortable- that was tremendous. AA is changing and I agree begrudgingly at times and I’m not sure where it will end. Yet, every Sunday I get the email from AA agnostica and it’s like cool drink of water on hot steamy day. Many thanks, Good Things

  5. John M. says:

    Mick, you make some very important distinctions here that make for a very appropriate and sober evaluation! Thanks for taking the time.

  6. Linda C. says:

    I was born in 1937 and have been sober since 1980. I was an atheist when I got sober and still am. I have never strayed away from AA or my recovery in it. Part of my recovery depends, I believe, in doing everything I can to open the doors of AA wide enough for everyone of every belief and non belief to feel welcome from the outset. I agree that it is an uphill road given the prevalence of the God Word and the massive experience and dependence of a seeming majority of AA members on a “higher power called God”. However, I always find it amazing that anyone can compare their early memory of “what AA was like” at any given time and “what it is like now.” My travels and service have made it possible for me to experience AA online and in person in many places (including Australia) and defining the overall message of AA worldwide “then and now” seems like an amazing ability of oversight hardly even imaginable to me. Yes, I believe absolutely that the AA program does not need (nor should aspire) to need the “spiritual” or “god dependent” aspect… it simply doesn’t need it, in my opinion. The program without that is powerful and and, from my perspective, diminished by the “God thing”. However, there are vast numbers of people worldwide who have brought that perspective INTO AA and continue to inform newcomers that despite the dated (and erroneous) Bill W. declarations of the qualification for sobriety being a belief in “Him” (or even a doorknob) the program survives. AA is still where thousands and thousands of alcoholics seek for relief and as long as this is where they come, this is where I will remain and try to “carry the message” of successful recovery without the “God thing” one day at a time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »

Discover more from AA Agnostica

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading